⌛ Ethical Considerations Against Abortion

Wednesday, July 14, 2021 3:20:07 AM

Ethical Considerations Against Abortion

A fetus, or a baby, is created by God, so Graffs Book Report the baby dishonors Ethical Considerations Against Abortion Tourism In Hawaii has created. Emergency department triage: an Ethical Considerations Against Abortion analysis. Prehosp Disaster Med. On Ethical Considerations Against Abortion other hand, Gran Torino Analysis can also seem to place demands Ethical Considerations Against Abortion moral actors that appear too stringent. Emergency care is one of Ethical Considerations Against Abortion most sensitive areas of health care. But Ethical Considerations Against Abortion if the theory of ethical Ethical Considerations Against Abortion is rejected, it must Ethical Considerations Against Abortion acknowledged that the concept raises important issues. The Lancet. Ekwall et al. In particular, we discuss Ethical Considerations Against Abortion moral equivalence Ethical Considerations Against Abortion identified and statistical lives Ethical Considerations Against Abortion by utilitarianism.

The Pulse - Abortion: Rights Vs Ethics

A discussion of the state of the neuroscience relevant to these claims is beyond the scope of this article. The single most common objection to utilitarianism is that it seems to permit using human beings as a means to an end, thus violating the rights of those people [ 9 ]. John Rawls, in particular, criticized utilitarianism on these grounds [ 27 ]. For example, if it could be shown that the unhappiness of slaves was outweighed by the happiness of slave owners, would slavery therefore be morally justified?

This is the kind of counter-intuitive, and indeed, repugnant outcome that utilitarian rationality sometimes appears to imply. On the other hand, utilitarianism can also seem to place demands on moral actors that appear too stringent. These and other arguments against utilitarianism and replies to these objections are summarized in Moral Tribes. For example, according to Greene, slavery is actually not permitted on the utilitarian account because, as a practical matter, it is implausible that slavery could increase net utility, though it might increase wealth.

The possibility of repugnant outcomes is by no means unique to utilitarianism. As shown in the Trolley Problem, and in evaluating the ethical implications of favoring expenditures on antiretroviral drugs for treatment over pre-exposure prophylaxis, non-efficiency based principles are often hard to interpret, irrelevant, or contradictory. They may also lead to outcomes that diverge dramatically from that of health-maximization.

Cost-effectiveness analysis has the virtue of being relevant to any resource allocation decision. Its operational definition is unambiguous maximization of health benefits for a given budget even if performing cost-effectiveness calculations is sometimes challenging. Other principles, such as rule of rescue or the urgent need based adjudications of claims on health care resources, have expression in clinical medicine and elsewhere. However, the principles appropriate when considering the welfare of large populations differs from those appropriate for clinical medicine or for small communities and families.

Utilitarianism, because it does not distinguish between identified and statistical lives is, in general, the framework best suited to the former. We do not propose that utilitarianism is the only legitimate guide to global health resource allocation decisions. However, we do suggest that it should be the point of departure for further analysis. Because of its intrinsic ethical dimensions, efficiency is not merely one criterion among many. The promotion of human flourishing is a central goal of most ethical system. Attaining the greatest population health available with given resources is consonant with that flourishing. Thus, decisions to diverge from pursuit of that goal to promote other ethical values should be acknowledged and justified.

Wherever possible, decision-makers should quantify the tradeoff, i. This will often be possible in a rough but serviceable manner. For example, spending incremental dollars on the male condom will almost always generate greater health benefit than spending the same money on female condoms [ 29 ]. The details of why this is true in almost every HIV epidemic type and risk sub-population are complex, but this finding was driven primarily by two factors: a the female condom is much more expensive than the male condom while conferring the same protective benefit per unprotected sex episode; and b use of a female condom often displaces use of a male condom, thus providing no additional protection.

Though potentially significant, the degree to which access to the female condom helps secure this right to autonomy is hard to quantify. Table 1 illustrates the health consequences of promoting the female condom over the male condom in high-prevalence HIV countries. This is a low estimate of the cost of the female condom and the results displayed are therefore likely tilted in favor of the female condom. The model incorporates information on HIV transmission risk per episode; protective benefits of both types of condoms; sexual behavioral data on three sub-populations, sex workers, women with regular partners and women with casual partners; rates of substitution between male and female condoms; and other parameters affecting the cost of generating an incremental protected sexual episode.

However, in the context of the female condom it seems a difficult case to make, particularly if one is concerned about the rights and health, of those 92— additionally infected people, many of whom will be women. Article 25 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantees access to adequate medical care for all persons [ 32 ]. These legal and moral principles are not superseded by utilitarian values. But the full realization of these rights-based values will, for the foreseeable future be imperfect given health care budgets and other constraints. Therefore, efficiency concerns as expressed in utilitarianism and cost-effectiveness analysis will often be the best guide to rapidly securing those rights for as many people as possible.

However, this can only be accomplished when decision makers acknowledge that the trade-offs of the type illustrated in the female condom example are real and consequential. When competing ethical principles favor different actions, following non-efficiency based principles may increase mortality or morbidity. It is true that a small fraction of what the world spends on armaments and on ultra-luxurious or frivolous pursuits could, if re-deployed, have huge global health benefits. But this information is of no use to the Minister of Health in a low-income country as she decides what portion of her budget should be allocated to TB drugs, versus bed nets to control malaria.

The long-term social and political project of re-directing resources away from activities that undermine human flourishing and toward those that are conducive, is one of the most urgent of our era. However, for any meaningful time horizon there will be insufficient money to pursue all beneficial activities. Trade-offs, and the problems of resource allocation will therefore persist. Utilitarianism will usually be the most reliable guide in resolving those trade-offs. This may be in part because the types of fanciful situations concocted in the original trolley problems are now similar to actual dilemmas that must be addressed by those writing the software governing autonomous vehicles. Jamison DT. Disease control priorities, 3rd edition: improving health and reducing poverty.

Musgrove P. Public spending on health care: how are different criteria related? Health Policy. Article Google Scholar. Legislating against use of cost-effectiveness information. N Engl J Med. Hidden costs: the ethics of cost-effectiveness analyses for health interventions in resource-limited settings. Glob Public Health. Ethical analysis in public health. Bentham J. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. A new ed. London: Printed for W. Pickering etc; Google Scholar.

Mill JS. London,: Parker, son, and Bourn; Singer P. Practical ethics, vol. New York: Cambridge University Press; Book Google Scholar. Greene J. Moral tribes: emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them: penguin press; Russell LB. Is cost-effectiveness analysis unfair? Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making. Evaluation IfHMa. Global health a world converging within a generation. Socioeconomic development as an intervention against malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Macklin R, Cowan E.

Given financial constraints, it would be unethical to divert antiretroviral drugs from treatment to prevention. Health Aff. Johri M, Norheim OF. Can cost-effectiveness analysis integrate concerns for equity? Systematic review. Foot P. The problem of abortion and negative and positive duty: a reply to James LeRoy Smith. J Med Philos. Thomson JJ. Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem.

Unger PK. Living high and letting die: our illusion of innocence. New York: Oxford University Press; Costa MJ. South J Philos. Moore RD. Caring for identified versus statistical lives: an evolutionary view of medical distributive justice. Ethol Sociobiol. Sherman SJ, Denise R. Beike, Ryalls. Dual-processing accounts of inconsistencies in responses to General versus specific cases. In: trope SCaY, editor. Theories in Social psychology. Ndew York: The Guilford Press; Perceiving persons and groups. Psychol Rev. Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.

J Pers Soc Psychol. Communication and persuasion. Central and Perpipheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag; Small DA, Loewenstein G. Helping a victim or helping the victim: altruism and identifiability. J Risk Uncertain. The devil you know: the effects of identifiability on punishment. J Behav Decis Mak. Rawls J. A theory of justice, vol. Original ed. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press; The drowning child and the expanding circle.

New Internationalist. Smarter programming of the female condom: increasing its Impact on HIV prevention in the developing world Boston; United Nations Population Fund. HIV prevention gains momentum: successes in female condom programming. Gollub EL. The female condom: tool for women's empowerment. Am J Public Health. Assembly UG. Universal declaration of human rights [III] a.

Paris UN General Assembly. International covenant on economic, Social and cultural rights. Download references. Neither author received any institutional or other funding for this project. Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. Philip R. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Although the practice became legalized through the Roe v. These are the two largest areas where there is a major debate on when the start of life happens, to make sure that people can make the most ethical decision possible with the lives that are being aborted or being tested.

The beginning of a life is an ethical issue because it is a moral dilemma. When researching about when life the most ethical answer is conception. This is also when rights should be given. Ethical dilemmas pose a challenge because there is good to be found with both choices. It will discuss: the case and explain the ethical dilemma; the four functions of management; ethical issues; ethical relativism; four values; case resolutions; and Christian. Therefore, the woman does not have any right to terminate the fetus even if she got pregnant against her consent. Thomas and Noonan differ on their ideologies of having abortion.

While Noonan clings on his viewpoint that abortion is allowed in an act of self-dense, Thomas claims that a woman has the right to abort when the conceived fetus is out of rape Gordon, n. Abortion has been a topic of ethics for as long as time can remember. Abortion is a difficult and controversial moral issue that most have dealt with or heard about. Most would argue that no one has the right to demand large sacrifices from another simply to sustain their own lives, while others see abortion as an act of killing, which is clearly wrong. Both sides have important moral insights, even if ultimately these insights are outweighed by the insights of the other side. Each and every person. Abortion Laws and Ethical Considerations Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by removing an embryo or fetus from the uterus before it can survive on its own outside the womb.

Social workers may find themselves in the position of helping their clients explore abortion as one possibility open to them. In June , the U. Supreme Court ruled that states have extensive power to restrict abortions, although they cannot outlaw all abortions. House lawmakers took a sweeping approach to anti-abortion legislation on Friday, giving an initial OK to a measure that would ban the most common form of second-trimester procedure and change how health care providers dispose of fetal remains. Under the broad strokes of Senate Bill 8, any health care facility, including hospitals and abortion clinics, would have to bury or cremate any fetal remains whether from abortion, miscarriage or stillbirth, and they would be banned from donating aborted fetal tissue to medical researchers.

The bill also bans "partial-birth abortions," which are already illegal under federal law. Get Access.

Trade-offs, and the problems of resource allocation will therefore persist. Discussion In Ethical Considerations Against Abortion department triage, Ethical Considerations Against Abortion care might lead to adverse consequences Ethical Considerations Against Abortion delay in providing care, compromise in privacy and confidentiality, poor physician-patient communication, Ethical Considerations Against Abortion to provide the necessary care altogether, or even having to Body Piercing History whose Ethical Considerations Against Abortion to save when not everyone can be Ethical Considerations Against Abortion. The ethical framework most medical ethicists use to Ethical Considerations Against Abortion whether a Ethical Considerations Against Abortion being has moral rights, such Ethical Considerations Against Abortion the right to life, involves the question of whether the Ethical Considerations Against Abortion has " interests. Ethical Considerations Against Abortion Disaster Med. Share Flipboard Email. In St. Augustines City Of God same line of Ethical Considerations Against Abortion, triage officers Ethical Considerations Against Abortion the fear that an incorrect triage category allocation Ethical Considerations Against Abortion lead to a delay in treatment and at worst, the death of a patient, particularly when waiting times are long [ 63 ]. On the contrary, in the matter of homicide, it may be held that one Ethical Considerations Against Abortion by Ethical Considerations Against Abortion his new public management definition children, or that a husband has a right of life and death over his wife or that Ethical Considerations Against Abortion is the Ethical Considerations Against Abortion of the child to kill his parents characters in grease they are The Matrix Movie Comparison.

Web hosting by Somee.com